The Question and Answer Board

[American_Dream]

In other words more meaningless tasks for Amdin to referee over.... lol

It seems to me their hands are more than full as it currently is in the "battle of the pumpers and bashers".

To me if i-hub balances the moderator position there will be less of that task for Admin to deal with.


Sure it would initially be a process to some extent in designating the current mods on each board to the group they belong in, but I don't think that's too difficult. For example, Admin can just require the current mods to "re-apply" as either "for" or "against" the company. I think 3 on each side, maybe 4, is a fair number. In the many cases where a board is dominated by one group of mods (let's say all 6 of the mods are "promotion mods", the three that will remain are the 3 who are most active), and obviously now there is a new group created for 3 members who are not hype about the company - and now it is balanced - now the information in the ibox and sticky posts is no longer one sided.


This would eliminate posts on the msg boards and annoying PM's sent to Admin of this sort:

1. why is the PR not in the ibox or stickys?
2. Aren't any of these mods investors?
3. Why isn't this awesome DD a sticky post or in the ibox?
4. Why is this site so biased?


That's what I see on boards dominated by one group of mods.
Many boards!

and it is vice versa...


1. why is this law suit not in the info box or sticky posts?
2. why is the share issuance/increase not listed anywhere?
3. how come all i see is promotion all over this scam?


This controversy is on MANY boards. It could be over 100 boards this is happening on? I see it a lot.

And I've proposed as good a way as any to fixing it. This change would change a lot of people's opinion on i-hub who may feel, largely because of this issue, that this is a biased website.


One objection to my proposal, that i can think of, is what happens if someone tricks the system. Applies "for the company" but is really against the company.

Well very soon it will be evident he/she lied about his position, loses all credibility with other members, and many posters will make it known there is a naughty moderator who needs... i-hub jail? Lol

It would be up to Admin to judge that unfit moderator. It wouldn't be an issue however, because very few people would waste their time and reputation to such an extent.

So i think this system would work much better than the current system. Hopefully a change is made!

Other than this all i can say is that even though this change may be better for equality... some times inequality can fuel a system. Controversy may lead to most posts which may lead to more money... for the site. I can not be sure..