Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,816.89
(
-0.11%
)
US TECH 100
24,499.60
(
0.38%
)
Dow Jones
47,916.57
(
-0.56%
)
Brent Oil
92.41
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
72,692.46
(
-0.39%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 6903
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

wbmw

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 29
Posts 25865
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/2002

wbmw

Member Level

Re: chipdesigner post# 1315

Wednesday, 02/08/2006 2:32:48 PM

Wednesday, February 08, 2006 2:32:48 PM

Post# of 6903
Re: I beg to differ with Charlie on the blame aspect-- Intel chose FB-DIMM tech for the Dempsey chipset, and now they pay for it. How many quarters of "constrained" FB-DIMM availability will Intel be facing *after* they launch in May?

If the article is believable, then zero. Why would they delay the chipset to align with FBD availability, and then launch a quarter later with continued availability constraints?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today