Parameter QC NGA QC Opti Freq 2.33Ghz 2.4 Ghz Cache 8MB 4MB Die size 2x135? 400 Memory BW 8.5GB/s 10.6 to 12.8GB/s Power 80W? 140W?
Not quite, Alan. Woodcrest QC will have two FSB connections and quad FBD channels, so the combined memory bandwidth is 17GB/s, which is greater than QC Opteron, so it should scale better. I would also expect Intel to do a 2x Conroe TDP for their MCM to achieve higher frequencies, so you can expect Woodcrest QC to clock at least two 2.66GHz @ 130W. Though there may be an 80W "LV" option for blades as well.
Here is my version of the chart.
Parameter QC NGA QC Opti @ 90nm QC Opti @ 65nm Freq 2.66+ Ghz 2.0+ Ghz 2.6+ GHz Cache 8MB 4MB 8MB Die size 2x135? 400 350 Memory BW 17.0GB/s 10.6 to 12.8GB/s same Power 130W? 140W? same
Your chart forgets that the chipset covers two sockets and puts one FSB to each socket. There aren't enough pins for Intel to put two FSBs into one Xeon socket. So Alan81 is correct.
If you want to show the dual socket version of the table with TDPs set to same standard as well:
Parameter QC NGA QC Opti @ 90nm QC Opti @ 65nm Freq 2.66+ Ghz 2.4+ Ghz 2.8+ GHz Cache 8MB 4MB 8MB Die size 2x135? 400 350 Memory BW 17.0GB/s 21.3 to 25.6GB/s 21.3 to 33.6GB/s Power 170W? Up to 140W? same NB incl. (DDR2/1066 support)