wbmw, well I certainly don't mean to hurt your feelings. I find a rigorous style of debate is usually necessary to get at the truth, especially on these public investor forums, where it is never clear what someone's motivations are, regardless of what they say they are.
When you post opinions without references, you should expect to be challenged.
For example, "huge frequency miss at launch".
You mean 1.8 GHz instead of 2.0 GHz ? One speed grade? It's a "miss", to be largely meaningless if 2.0 GHz parts show up within the next couple weeks, but a "huge miss"?
I like your input, but given your Intel bias, I feel the need to conduct due diligence on any unsupported claims. It's nothing personal.
Doug
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
