News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257272
Next 10
Followers 69
Posts 4516
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/13/2009

Re: honestabe13 post# 172003

Tuesday, 12/31/2013 3:08:50 PM

Tuesday, December 31, 2013 3:08:50 PM

Post# of 257272

yet people here assume the know the FDA was critical...



They - most people here - don't know, but they can read data, make educated guesses.

I asked same question before and after 2nd line NSCLC data blowup in Sept 2012. I haven't got a reasonable answer from anyone who believed the result. I'll post the questions again:

In Sept 2012 data release, many people noticed placebo arm had more bleeding events than 1 mg arm which was odd. Later the company said placebo arm and 1 mg arm were mixed up. Assume this was true, based on AE profile of the 3 arms, it implied placebo arm got more study drug than 1 mg arm because 3 mg arm had more bleeding events than placebo arm. However, 1 mg arm had better efficacy (statistically significant HR) over placebo arm than 3 mg arm over placebo arm.

If people can't see implications from above, well, good luck in waiting a few years to find out in ph3.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today