Has anybody been consistently right or wrong about bavi or PPHM? TBD, isn't it?
Peregrine touted their 2nd Line PIIb as a gold-standard trial. It turned out to be a standard screwup for PPHM. Like the HFV government contract that they said they were confident would be renewed; like the PIIb 1st Line trial that read well in December but not in March when independent eyes evaluated the data . . .
I don't say that the current bavi PIII won't return stat. sig. but PPHM has given her critics ample, legitimate cause to be skeptical of the company and, as a result, all of its data. I can't see how anybody could be critical of the PPHM skeptics at this point given PPHM's track record and the sad state of their statistical data going into this PIII.