Your other questions will be answered this weekend.
Cost effective access to talent --- meaning?
I am personally capable of creating everything we need, both software and hardware, to re-launch and to adapt our existing and former products for their originally-intended purposes within current compute platforms of every kind (mobile, cloud, etc. which were insignificant-sized markets and platforms back in 2004/2005 but are dramatically larger today and even overtaking or replacing the prior desktop computing and server-based computing markets) but I cannot continue to work for free.
It has never even been my intent nor desire to issue additional shares to myself, so I have been working on all of this for free in every sense of the word and at some point that cannot continue. Furthermore, we need additional co-developers and co-founders. This is why I have set up the following social profiles, and others, that will, I believe, become useful next year for growing new strategic relationships.
We do have a number of supporters and contributors who are ready to begin providing substantial co-development work product -- the team that is ready to work more substantially needs to ensure, among other things, that the unresolved equity theft issue has been resolved by the return of the shares improperly-issued by Shelly and Wen since 2011. We all need to know that when new value is created that it is not being misappropriated by Shelly and Wen or anyone else who received shares improperly since 2011 in violation of the agreements that were (and are still) in effect.
I do not want to be required to issue large numbers of shares to the co-developers, nor do I want to be required to pay large salaries, in order to produce what must be produced and grow what must be grown. That is what I mean by "cost-effective" access to talent. Simply answering the question "what price does my own contribution justify?" is challenging as things begin to grow.
Assuming that we have new development work being done by our growing team going forward, this question will be easy to answer because there will be an equitable balance of fairness and reason in which my contributions can be evaluated relative to others' but in previous years the efforts and revenues were almost exclusively my own forensics consulting services -- if I am the only person producing revenue, and we have no other employees, then what are we doing here in the first place? One adviser suggested, a few years ago, that we could perhaps become the first-ever one-man billion-dollar publicly-traded company. Do you believe Facebook could have grown to be what it is today if Mark had worked alone?