News Focus
News Focus
Followers 18
Posts 5887
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/29/2011

Re: None

Monday, 12/16/2013 12:33:07 AM

Monday, December 16, 2013 12:33:07 AM

Post# of 80876
Went to DICKS in Oceanside, CA tonight.

Found one container of the old ASSAULT on the shelf there.

A 1.62-pound tub of Blue Arctic Raspberry for $39.99

It had a INFORMED CHOICE label on it AND said "...Assault meets NSF and INFORMED CHOICE product standards and is safe for kidney and liver function..."

It did not have the NSF blue dot with the white NSF in the middle.

The production code on the bottom of the container reads as follows:

LOT 150632 032
EXP 04/15

There were 3 ea. .96 lb. containers of the new ASSAULT with PurEnergy for $39.99 each.

One 1.01 lb. container of AMINO 1 for $34.99

Two 2 lb. containers of COMBAT for $44.99 each.

I was told that MP was the fastest selling sport supplement product they offered at DICKS.

Looks like this older tub of ASSAULT was produced in April of 2013 if a 2-year expiration was put on it.

Some apparent labelling confusion here.

Why would MP want to pay for two different certifications?

Somebody screwed up here when making these labels and the duality of the certification wasn't caught by higher ups in the MP QC department.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today