Yeah Mr. Big, gonna STRADDLE the posts you and Mellow are stringing along. Agreeing with both of you. Actually, there isn't any contention on your respective posts. HMMM
Here to stir up trouble:)
Naah. On your post about the Government Backing, I'm just wholly on board with that. Wearing this aspect out myself, but I truly believe the DLA's September announcement on Friday the 13th about seven Industrial Partner Venture (IPV) sites at depot level facilities bringing up fill SigNATURE DNA processing lines was to keep us alive.
And it will. The October announcement at the DLA's Electronic Community Forum stated we had 27 active lines. Those seven IPVs added $350K to our upcoming earnings report.
I think Mellow's point of the company appearing like a failure on the spreadsheets is realistic too. I think this made us the low lying fruit, easy pickings for the MMs to control us.
On that, we've bitched and moaned about our board not doing anything about the outside MMs controlling our destiny. Got a citation I found goes along with we expect this pup to zoom sometime and maybe our board is doing right
Go down fighting: Short sellers vs. firmsABSTRACT I study battles between short sellers and firms. Firms use a variety of ways to impede short selling, including explicit or implicit legal threats, investigations, lawsuits, and various technical actions intended to create a short squeeze. Firms that take these actions create short sale constraints. Consistent with the hypothesis that short sale constraints allow stocks to be overpriced, firms taking anti-shorting actions have in the subsequent year very low abnormal returns of about -2 percent per month..
All this BS I post is just my way of reasoning through/justifying my irrational conduct in honestly being in over my head. Believe me, the dark side rears it's damn self all the time in me. I got faith though, AND, the GOVT SUPPORT earlier is a big foundational belief for me.
Very Respectfully Gentlemen, strike that, VR and GLTA mcsharkey