News Focus
News Focus
Followers 24
Posts 3145
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/30/2009

Re: Nanotoday post# 77084

Tuesday, 11/26/2013 8:11:48 AM

Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:11:48 AM

Post# of 146479
Again Ovidus was stating as a fact something that he was only conjecturing (on the basis of wishful thinking apparently) just as he did before when he claimed Dr Seymour was a veterinarian.

1) It WAS proved by what Iposted (with the name of the original product and company).

2) the company posted by liefsmith may well have bought the product from the original company (or just acquired the original company) - you'd have to trace out the product's history (from the original company forward) to know where it is now. THAT IS COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT!

We know that there was a product that was succssful at the time Dr Seymour was associated with it. What happened to it subsequently was not Dr Seymour's responsibility.

My general policy is that when someone posts a third conjecture in a row presented as a fact that turns out to be completely false (and could have been found to have been false by a mere few seconds of DD had the original poster had any concern whatsoever whether it was true or not) I put them on ignore.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NNVC News