News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257273
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122807
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: ciotera post# 170304

Thursday, 11/21/2013 2:32:31 PM

Thursday, November 21, 2013 2:32:31 PM

Post# of 257273

I don't understand your logic. Even if I grant you that physicians will not appreciably increase the number of patients they have on therapy simultaneously (although I think they will), won't reducing the length of treatment to 12 weeks (compressing visits to a shorter period) mean that they can have more treatment cohorts during a given 12 month window?

If the number of overall visits per patient remains the same (for the sake of argument), then the number of patients a physician can treat per unit of time (say, one year) must also stay the same because there are only so many office-visit hours in a given period of time. (It makes no difference how many patients the physician can treat simultaneously.)

I’ll concede that scrapping interferon should lead to fewer “unplanned” patient visits, but I don’t see that as a game-changer in overall throughput.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today