News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257266
Next 10
Followers 49
Posts 5519
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/19/2006

Re: DewDiligence post# 170132

Monday, 11/18/2013 5:52:53 PM

Monday, November 18, 2013 5:52:53 PM

Post# of 257266

I don’t fully understand why you think the non-ribavirin arms of PEARL-2/3/4 are so easy to handicap. For the record, what are your expectations for each of these trial arms?



Between AVIATOR and PEARL-1 interim there's data to draw upon - especially knowing the good tolerability of the regimen (even with rib but certainly without) given results from the ph 3 that reported today. So my guess:

1b naives 95+% SVR12 (some 1bs carry a baseline resistance variant to abt-333 but we know from PEARL 1 that you probably don't even need abt-333). If anything the Japanese 1bs are harder to treat..

1b experienced my guess (although with somewhat less confidence) is 90% or so, again from PEARL 1

1a naives may be hardest to predict, but using AVIATOR data I think I can take a reasonable stab. 2/3 of the 79 pts or 53 pts in the naïve arm were 1a. If you assume the 27 or so 1bs did about 98% (fair assumption based on the 42 pts in PEARL 1) then the 1a pts had SVR 12s of 85% ballpark to get to a blended SVR12 of 90% in that AVIATOR cohort

I don't think we're going to see results deviate more than 5% or so from these numbers - especially again now that we know tolerability is excellent so on treatment SVR shouldn't deviate much from ITT

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today