Biotech Values

[jq1234]

You medical research folks and biostatisticians tend to see things in more or less black-and-white terms. But clinical practice involves infinite shades of gray.

That's your misinterpretation. Data presented are clear for what the numbers are - they are black and white, 1 is 1, 2 is 2 - but interpretation of data and future implication of the data are grey. As of Tefferi's abstract, neither PGS and I interpreted the data in our replies to you as we simply argued what the actual numbers were - I commented on my own interpretation of data separately to BTH - we just said what the numbers were. You don't like to hear what the numbers are - you want to hear CR means complete resolution of MF according to IWG criteria - so you think we are biased. Could Imelestat do everything for MF in the future, sure, possible, that's people's own interpretation of data, that's not what the data said right now no matter how you argue about it.