News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257454
Next 10
Followers 77
Posts 4790
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2003

Re: poorgradstudent post# 169516

Thursday, 11/07/2013 12:23:30 PM

Thursday, November 07, 2013 12:23:30 PM

Post# of 257454
GERN -

From reading the abstract I thought it indicated accurately what was achieved and what wasn't achieved. They noted spleen size at entry but made no mention of size reduction following treatment, so we can safely assume no spleen responses.



Spleen size is perhaps the sine qua non of MF clinical symptoms. To be silent on it when you can and did measure it is, in my book, at the very least misleading. To not address lack of effect on it is dangerous.

Why do I call it 'misleading' - because even very savvy biotech investors have gotten caught by similar omissions by GERN. And I would suggest that you have been in biotech land too long if you consider it acceptable to be silent on statistically meaningful data on what is probably the most important clinical symptom.

All that said, not sure there is point to further semantic debate since semantic debate is rarely very informative past a certain point.

BTW - just to reiterate, I think imetelstat likely has a place somewhere in the MF spectrum of diseases. But I think it will be difficult to find it for some of the reasons AF gave - and made substantially more difficult if they cannot address the problem head on.

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now