Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,616.85
(
0.08%
)
US TECH 100
24,082.40
(
2.30%
)
Dow Jones
46,584.46
(
-0.18%
)
Brent Oil
101.21
(
-5.47%
)
Bitcoin
72,135.55
(
4.76%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 98354
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

economaniac

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 2
Posts 53
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/06/2003

economaniac

Re: Elmer Phud post# 2707

Tuesday, 04/22/2003 2:04:13 AM

Tuesday, April 22, 2003 2:04:13 AM

Post# of 98354
Elmer, re Hammer gets it's but kicked by Itanium in TPCC and edges out Xeon (for now)

http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_8796_8800~69696,00.html

following your link, Hammer is 6 % faster than Xeon (106 to 100) while Itanium is ... 6.7% faster than Hammer (113 to 106)

Do you really think that extra .7% makes the difference between "edging out" and "kicking butt"? Is it just possible that you aren't being entirely objective in comparisons between AMD and Intel?

E
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent AMD News
More AMD News