Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,073.90
(
-0.50%
)
US TECH 100
25,800.40
(
-0.28%
)
Dow Jones
49,260.00
(
-0.38%
)
Brent Oil
95.63
(
5.46%
)
Bitcoin
75,218.20
(
-0.89%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 347009
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

EYEBUYSTOX

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 48
Posts 3935
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/26/2011

EYEBUYSTOX

Re: ImaPseudonym post# 146688

Tuesday, 10/29/2013 4:08:13 PM

Tuesday, October 29, 2013 4:08:13 PM

Post# of 347009
Humor me...

If PS really is a target that doubles or triples life expectancy in several cancers (hasn't happened yet, but IF), would it not be in the interest of national security to make sure a US BP gets the chance to take it over? Now lets say the largest shareholder of that company is well-known for tax evasion. Wouldn't that be motivation for pro-US forces to keep the company's shares on home soil?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote