CWV...So violated ethics?
Your thought is entertaining, and it would be nice if it were true and the all the misdeeds with be undone and payment made for all of the damages, but...
... you are asserting that SG attorneys worked on the EC representation and (not only did not charge for it) violated ethics standards and did not apply for admission to the case to represent the EC?
Really?
To further, if they were "behind the curtain, writing the scripts and pulling the strings," this result that most are so feverishly unhappy with is successful?
OK to believe such. I don't. The fact that BR and WGM, 'or any other party in interest with the debtor, JPM or the FDIC, didn't object to their retention, in hindsight, is telling. You do understand what SG had for conflicts with the SR note holders group, correct? But it does support an edge theory; the puppetmaster, in the assignment and application of experienced counsel [or lack thereof]. Hmmmm. I guess, good point in that regard.
Market Data 
Markets 
