News Focus
News Focus
Followers 16
Posts 1891
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/14/2004

Re: Al4343 post# 43806

Tuesday, 10/22/2013 5:46:21 PM

Tuesday, October 22, 2013 5:46:21 PM

Post# of 53982
So you believe a large entity would invest in multiple KDS from a non reporting company with an sp of .015?? No track history. I get your point and I think it depends. If I were a large company considering getting into bed with FASC through some long range partnership or joint venture, I would definitely think twice. But what about the purchase of a handful of machines. Lets assume 5 machines. How does their non-SEC compliance really affect the sale/purchase? Mainland Machinery actually manufactures the machines and provides a manufacturing warranty. Fasc simply owns the rights to the technology. Based on the long gestation period of the projects, we know that much investigation, time and effort goes into the process in consideration of the purchase of a KDS. I do believe that companies will consider many factors in making a large deal. However I believe the weight/importance that a company assigns to the stock price of the selling company is not nearly as significant as you believe it to be. FASC probably has much more credibility than we think in their field of expertise than we can appreciate since our focus is simply on pps and communications. We know that Brian couldn't give 2 hoots about pps or shareholder communications but he probably commands respect for substantive reasons related to the product and its applications. Sorry for rambling.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today