News Focus
News Focus
Followers 408
Posts 58832
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 05/01/2010

Re: Kimber1911 post# 24363

Saturday, 10/12/2013 11:27:46 AM

Saturday, October 12, 2013 11:27:46 AM

Post# of 66424
NO, I DO NOT AGREE. I've never stated anything that would cause any reader to assume I felt that way. Please do not twist my words to mean something other than what I actually said. I will state once again for anyone who doesn't know by now:

1. MEXP OWNS 6% of AWS.
2. EVERY OTCMARKETS REPORT SHOWS MEXP HAS NO REVENUE.
3. AWS IS NOT A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY.
4. SHAREHOLDERS HAVE NOT GAINED ANY ADDED VALUE FROM AWS.
5. MEXP IS NO-BID FOR OVER A YEAR.
6. MEXP FILED FOR A 1:1000 REVERSE SPLIT.

And contrary to what you posted, A REVERSE SPLIT DOES NOT MEAN SHAREHOLDERS ARE GETTING A DIVIDEND. Let's try to keep the data factual.


So you agree that that AWS saw tremendous growth while under MEXP? And that MEXP did in fact wholly own AWS for a short period of time? It is obvious to all that this is indeed true, also it is becoming clear that MEXP is indeed telling the truth the more I dig, the more I see that MEXP was telling the truth, which is why I changed my opinion on MEXP. I too once thought MEXP was a scam, then I did some great DD and found otherwise.




For those who understand, no explanation is needed, For
those who do not understand, no explanation is possible

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y