News Focus
News Focus
Followers 16
Posts 2682
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/16/2004

Re: Deewar25 post# 329

Friday, 01/13/2006 6:06:46 PM

Friday, January 13, 2006 6:06:46 PM

Post# of 6501
lol I just keep laughing those severe severe. severe primary, and primary severe. I lost! I guess even Insmed and Tercica and FDA get confused too. There is a definition about severe and primary according to the companies.

You're right on the target. If it's good for Increlex, then it is better for iPlex. I guess the wording of "severe or no severe" is very important for both of Increlex and iPlex. If FDA did make a mistake on the word of severe (forgot to give severe to iPlex for orphan status, then iPlex surely got the best deal. And too late to change it for FDA. I know Tercica is doing trial for Increlex for primary IGF-1, it will be harder to get FDA approval since FDA already granted orphan primary IGFD to Insmed.

Nice catch, Deewar25, excellent! I never thought those. I will check FDA papers this weekend and also ask others for opinion.


Peace!

C-Starz

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INSM News