Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

1) I DIDN'T think that ever. That's your assumption or misconception.
2) I'm fully aware of the penny stocks risk. You somehow find a need to repeat that even tho several of my lasts posts, including the last one stated exactly that fact, so...
3) when you say "we" know this & "we" know that, about whatever, I guess you fancy yourself as a spokesman for the board or you have a frog in your pocket. That's fine, but others have also urged caution here as well, recently. I didn't mean for it to be such a big deal, but if ppl bring up contradictory remarks to the way I presented my point, I replied to & defended the points that I though we're worth it. The truth is that not everybody understands the risks the same way you might. There's many ppl who read the board who aren't vocal & you may think you know everybody & how everybody thinks, but you don't.
4)the way you just characterized it... as you & all your fellow stockholders are the "big boys" & i'm just some chicken little that you don't need around here is very telling. I know that I've been a gentleman & respectful in my comments & have not only the same right to speak my mind as you, but also have given facts & have value to my comments. Also have a fair amount of experience enough to know a thing or two.
5) what your post says about it being the riskiest thing there is... sound like a most definite backpedal to me. I admire your convenient current viewpoint.
6) I have no desire to go on about the same thing or around the same circle. I only started out urging caution & gave good reasons, whether you agree w/them or not, but it seems to have stirred a hornets nest. It not only makes me wonder why the couple of you who make a big deal over it, would be so touchy about it to do so. My wondering leads me to conclude that some people are too defensive about a cautionary story. It is to those people.... that come on boards and tout the very certain windfall impending, (contrary to your characterization of yourself now, as someone fully cognizant of the most risky thing you be in) who should have such sentiments countered or modified by whatever or whoever thinks they have an at equally sensible but different viewpoint. So I did. And I will again if I think it honestly appropriate. Let me ask you this: if you had the billions or whatever is the amount that you currently think the company should accept right now, would you buy it? I think you would likely be inclined to. If so, then why haven't the big guys who likely know more than you about what there is to know bought it before they lose such a gem? If no, why not?