| Followers | 110 |
| Posts | 20258 |
| Boards Moderated | 0 |
| Alias Born | 05/08/2008 |
Friday, September 06, 2013 11:31:01 AM
It is a reverse split in all respects aside from the fact that they're trying to act like it isn't.
It doesn't matter that hugely reduced number of shares that current holders will receive will be in another company
I'll tell you why some worry about RSs. When they are perceived badly, there are always three things that are true:
1) The company doing the RS has no, or virtually no, business
2) PPS has death spiralled to $.0001 and No Bid.
3) The company either RS's or closes shop.
These were the conditions for BBDA in 2010. In fact BBDA was at no Bid for 3 months...so live or die decision was made. This is not the case with BBDA now.
When these things are not the conditions, RS's are not perceived negatively, but for what they are ...value neutral. None of the list of 3 are conditions now for BBDA, thus no RS is even needed. The share structure does not need fixing; the market cap does. This will take care of itself as business and transpaency grows with new company. There are NYSE/NASDAQ companies with more shares than BBDA, doing just fine.
...with no assets, the result is the same.
"A man sees in the world what he carries in his heart" ** Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe
"Never does a man portray his own character more vividly, than in his manner of portraying another" -- Richter
