InvestorsHub Logo

nyt

Followers 25
Posts 12682
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2011

nyt

Re: Spec_Investor post# 6438

Thursday, 08/29/2013 8:41:29 AM

Thursday, August 29, 2013 8:41:29 AM

Post# of 130734
Mr spec... I hear what your saying. The sense I get, various things about this stock considered, is not cause for alarm, but a cause for "concern" is more prudent than having none... the main reason being that it was one of the most significant drops in both percentage & to the level it dropped to, at a time when it just seems it has enuff going for it, to not really expect it, AL least not in my very limited knowledge level. Some others, here on the board, with experience & knowledgeable also are a bit aggro over the seeming stubbornness the stock is exhibiting. After all, stagnation & then big dips w/o obvious cause, on the heels of more than tremendous potential news on patents progress & mngmt super upgrades, are fair reasons I think, to warrant a natural concern, at least to know why. But agreed it not necessarily that big a deal in itself, however, by your own gauge & measure, the nature of a pennystock, in general, is more volatile inherently, thus maybe an investor cannot trust it's stability as much as a big dog. Your point about magnified swing effect w/low relative shareholder numbers, is well taken, but that could also mean the swings are more potentially potent. Also where is the official number of stockholders? I saw a much lower # somewhere recently but not sure where..
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News