Monday, August 12, 2013 11:20:55 AM
Right on target with your analysis. The big difference regarding mCopaxone vs mLovenox is that MNTA's share of revenues from their partner won't change if a second generic enters the market. A second generic is what kept MNTA's price lower. If MNTA had the Copaxone type deal for mENOX, they would be getting $80-$100 million/quarter despite Amphastar's entry. That would have made a dramatic difference in MNTAs stock price.
Cannabix Technologies Announces First Delivery of Marijuana Breath Test (MBT) to a Major Construction Client • BLOZF • Mar 19, 2026 12:45 PM
ECGI Building in Crypto's Top-Performing Sector as Tokenized Real-World Assets Surge Past $26 Billion • ECGI • Mar 19, 2026 8:30 AM
Advances in Domestic Heavy Rare Earth Minerals Production Essential for North American Defense Stockpiles • ALOY • Mar 18, 2026 9:00 AM
ECGI Advances $10M Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as SEC Interpretation Adds Clarity • ECGI • Mar 18, 2026 8:45 AM
ECGI Advances Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as Institutional Market Rails Continue to Develop • ECGI • Mar 17, 2026 8:30 AM
Record Gold Prices Reshape Economics of New Mine Development • SNWGF • Mar 16, 2026 10:46 AM
