Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,816.89
(
-0.11%
)
US TECH 100
24,499.60
(
0.38%
)
Dow Jones
47,916.57
(
-0.56%
)
Brent Oil
92.41
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
71,729.65
(
-1.85%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 312101
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

arvitar

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 56
Posts 14300
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/19/2009

arvitar

Re: Mattylite post# 237911

Saturday, 08/10/2013 5:40:19 PM

Saturday, August 10, 2013 5:40:19 PM

Post# of 312101
It's NOT a freaking "dividend". This explanation by LR seems very clear and easy to understand:


1. All current shareholders will not participate.
2. In order to participate, claimants will have to have first lost money on sales of shares.
3. Some portion of the participants are certain to be FORMER shareholders.


There is no known definition by which that is a "DIVVY".




This should be repeatedly cited, over and over, until John Bordynuik drops his insultingly stupid spin of calling this damaging court settlement a "divvy".

A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything. Friedrich Nietzsche

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote