Sunday, July 21, 2013 6:03:15 PM
In his opinion, Judge Gorton expresses concern that Ampha indeed might have concealed info in violation of court order. Nevertheless, he concluded that the additional claims raised by MNTA were covered by the safe harbor or, in the case of one claim, of no consequence.
I believe a motion for sanctions against Ampha for the alleged concealment is still pending. Additional proceeding will presumably be required as to what damages MNTA/Sandoz might owe.
http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/massachusetts/madce/1:2011cv11681/139177/497/0.pdf?ts=1374318031
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies Announces First Delivery of Marijuana Breath Test (MBT) to a Major Construction Client • Mar 19, 2026 12:45 PM
ECGI Building in Crypto's Top-Performing Sector as Tokenized Real-World Assets Surge Past $26 Billion • ECGI • Mar 19, 2026 8:30 AM
Advances in Domestic Heavy Rare Earth Minerals Production Essential for North American Defense Stockpiles • ALOY • Mar 18, 2026 9:00 AM
ECGI Advances $10M Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as SEC Interpretation Adds Clarity • ECGI • Mar 18, 2026 8:45 AM
ECGI Advances Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as Institutional Market Rails Continue to Develop • ECGI • Mar 17, 2026 8:30 AM
Record Gold Prices Reshape Economics of New Mine Development • SNWGF • Mar 16, 2026 10:46 AM
