News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257268
Next 10
Followers 69
Posts 6152
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/26/2008

Re: oc631 post# 163853

Thursday, 07/11/2013 6:19:29 PM

Thursday, July 11, 2013 6:19:29 PM

Post# of 257268

You are right. Since we were talking about GT1 and GT3 within the new 3B study I was thinking about the design of the GT1 study.

GT1 is still the biggest piece of the HCV pie and I still don't get why GILD would expand to 16 and 24-week trials in GT1 if the other trial they are running of 8 and 12-weeks would otherwise suffice. This is a Phase 3b but both safety and efficacy are being measured. Why need to measure for efficacy for 16 and 24-weeks if 8 and 12 was sufficient from other trial with GT1 patients? Doesn't make sense to me.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today