EP Global Communications Inc fka EPGL

[CommonVestor]

He never once questioned in his post if Google glass was FDA approved and I think that pretty B&W, he's stating that the MPDD is FDA approved and that this in it self factual.

Just to let people know on the board for them selves, as stated in my previous posts. Here is a link of devices from just this year that were approved with 510k substantial equivalence. You might NOT find it surprising what companies are in the list. Anyway for a company to limit engineering fees,manufacturing costs and FDA trails and testing sounds like a great way of cutting costs and breaking even faster on their new product. I cannot in my wonder see how this is bad. I cannot understand why companies such as SAMSUNG can do this and it not be question but with EPGL its their downfall. I hope every device they create is approved under substantial equivalence so EPGL can get these devices approved and manufactured. And another note just because they were approved under substantial equivalence doesn't mean that just anyone can recreate a product. If GE spent a 500 million to manufacture a product and get it approved it still will take another of their caliber to create their version built on their platform. It in no way limits the authenticity of the device their trying to produce in vision of its function.

http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm?start_search=1&Panel=&ProductCode=&KNumber=K&Model=&Applicant=&DeviceName=&Type=&ThirdPartyReviewed=off&ClinicalTrials=off&ExpeditedReview=&Decision=SE&DecisionDateFrom=&DecisionDateTo=&IVDProducts=off&CombinationProducts=off&PAGENUM=10&SortColumn=DecisionDateDESC