Since we are getting ”3” shares of ”Medical Greens” for every ”1” share of ”SKTO” that we purchase, there is a chance that a ”price adjustment” logically will ”not” be required because of this technically not being a forward split of SKTO shares which could logically require that the price of SKTO remains as is as our positions are increased by 3 to create an ”additional sum” transaction. I think that this will be kind of like an ”Initial Public Offering (IPO)” where if SKTO could show justification in revenues or contracts to justify a value where such ”zero sum” transaction is not required, then the SEC just might allow the closing price of SKTO on the date that the forward split takes place to either remain the same or even be allowed to open up higher and not have the price of SKTO reduced 3-fold. I’m not sure, but either way would be awesome for us SKTO shareholders as this is only some logical food for thought.
IG
It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled