Proper interpretation of public information is exactly what will be cleared up in the call...
And all if it always leads to the same Conclusion that Natalie is working on an 8k ...
Just like her last email clearly stated
email below
On 2013-06-22, at 1:34 PM, Natalie Bannister wrote: As publicly stated in press releases, periodic reports, and previous emails from me, I'm currently exploring all ventures to revive the company. That includes a joint venture, merger, acquisition, or other means necessary to rebuild positively and grow.
$DUSS is a prime candidate for a merger
A reporting company with a low share structure is very attractive as a reverse merger candidate for a solid public company.
All you need to do is offer restricted shares off of the AS and bring in Instant Value of the new entity.
It's a win win for both current shareholders and the new entity.
They would both grow together.
Our pps would immediately move to its new perceived value based on value and growth potential.
The key is to find a worthy candidate !
My DD tells me Nat will deliver with quality !
Disclaimer: My opinion is based on extensive DD of fundamental & technical analysis of the company, its business plan and management. I am not a financial advisor nor a stock promoter. I am an investor. Please Do your own DD and make your own investment d