Reading this half way, you had my head shaking...I will offer one comment though:
The Marble Theory ...
A company would create an increase in ”demand” for marbles by increasing the ”supply” of marbles by splitting the boulder into 3 smaller marbles so that parent's would be able to afford them. By the company not doing so, only that one kid would be happy with his boulder and would be forced to play alone and the company would have far less of a customer base interested in buying marbles therefore decreasing the growth of the company. After experimenting with that one boulder, you now should see the anticipated growth from its management's view of future potential.
If I have read all of the forum DD correctly and the justification as to why SKTO is already a leader in this space with no peer, it is no different than stating that they compete in a monopolistic market, correct?
If that is the case, this marble theory makes no sense as there is no supply curve in a monopoly. There is no need to create demand by increasing supply. Also, increasing supply does not necessarily increase demand either. What it does is, it allows the stock/product to find a clearing price (aka equilibrium) and often times this is a phenomenon that occurs by lowering price. This ultimately moves quantities/volume and is a strategy that is employed when volume or quantity competition is in place.
If SKTO were the leader in this space, demand, hence also price should ultimately be controlled and dictated by SKTO/Medical Greens, Inc.