News Focus
News Focus
Followers 277
Posts 12043
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 02/09/2003

Re: Cassandra post# 82068

Wednesday, 06/26/2013 10:07:29 PM

Wednesday, June 26, 2013 10:07:29 PM

Post# of 93862
Interesting... the Grundig Docket history available here, shows that there were three separate Motions to Approve Consent Judgment. The first two were not granted. The third, which was filed on 6/25/13 was granted the same day. It sure would be interesting to see what was going on and to read the the final consent judgment (Docket #24) which is 11 pages long.

5/29/2013 17 Main 3 Motion to Approve Consent Judgment
5/29/2013 1 3 Memorandum of Points and Authorities
5/29/2013 2 3 Declaration of Pamela C. Chalk
5/29/2013 3 13 Exhibit Exhibit A to Declaration of Pamela C. Chalk
5/30/2013 18 Main 6 Order Following Case Management Conference
5/30/2013 19 Main 2 Order on Motion to Approve Consent Judgment
6/4/2013 20 Main 7 Order
6/11/2013 21 Main 3 Motion to Approve Consent Judgment
6/11/2013 1 5 Memo of Points and Authorities Memorandum of Points and Authorities
6/11/2013 2 3 Declaration of Pamela C. Chalk
6/11/2013 3 13 Exhibit A to Declaration of Pamela C. Chalk
6/25/2013 22 Main 8 Order
6/25/2013 23 Main 2 Order on Motion to Approve Consent Judgment
6/25/2013 24 Main 11 Consent Judgment


Entire docket history for this and the other EDIG lawsuits available at:
http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/patent-lawsuits/california-southern-district-court/123815/e-digital-corporation-v-grundig-intermedia-gmbh-et-al/official-court-documents/

You might have to hit the button to update the list, which takes only a couple of minutes.

Where Real Traders Talk Markets

Join thousands of traders sharing insights, catalysts, and charts.

Join Today