News Focus
News Focus
Followers 842
Posts 122795
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: mouton29 post# 10634

Monday, 06/24/2013 1:14:46 PM

Monday, June 24, 2013 1:14:46 PM

Post# of 20689

…contrary to their position here that the “court of appeals definitively determined the scope of Section 271(e)(1),” Pet. 32, petitioners have told the district court that they “will oppose” respondents’ “motion for summary judgment based solely upon the [safe harbor]…

I don’t see what grounds NVS/MNTA could have for opposing the motion for summary judgment in the District Court.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”