News Focus
News Focus
Followers 109
Posts 11523
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/21/2006

Re: Rawnoc post# 231314

Sunday, 06/23/2013 8:10:34 AM

Sunday, June 23, 2013 8:10:34 AM

Post# of 312102
Baloney- The reverse merge sub-penny PPS is irrelevant.

If JBI had IPO'd like a real company, instead of a stinky pinky reverse merger claptrap, then the PPS would have been valuated and set prior to public trading. Comparing the high-water mark of $7.00 set by JBII to a shell valued sub-penny PPS is so much blather, not to mention incredibly misleading.

Is it any wonder that FINRA is attempting to phase out reverse mergers?

http://www.securitieslawyer101.com/6490-reverse-merger/

There's no reason to think that at .40 the market is wise. We could be back to subpenny or $7.00 in the future, and the .40 mark told us nothing other than the markets, JBII included, aren't very efficient.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y