Is iHub A Scam?

[Was (Bob)]

Finally something on which we can agree.

The misconception that negative posts are systematically deleted is simply not true,

I agree with this one. There are heated discussions as we hammer out some of the finer points of what should and shouldn't be deleted, but really very few posts are getting deleted, and of those that're getting deleted, I'm restoring only a tiny fraction.

By and large, most of the chairpeople and I are on the same page. And the ones who aren't on the same page with me are at least in the same chapter. Don't anyone think that the vehemence with which we're disagreeing is a condemnation of the concept itself. We're arguing over finer points that're focused in small areas of the site. And the results will be adjustments both in my approach and theirs.

But deletion occur very rapidly, with minimum intervention of the iHUB staff...

And a HUGE benefit I get out of this is that rather than getting a dozen complaints about a particular post, researching it, deleting it, and replying to all the emails, I only have to scan the deleted posts. Once we get this concept optimized (in philosophy and in application), it'll get even easier. And one of the changes in how it's applied should be taking place in just a few more days.