Rambus (RMBS)

[smd1234]

On the 15th, this Thursday, his nibs will rule on Exceptioal case. Is this correct?there is a hearing on it, but Rambus has 'til the 21st to reply on the "no jurisdiction point" - see below

By the 14th Samsung will have to answer whether they agree to Rambus's rule 68 on attorney's fees? Is this correct?we know Sammy's answer based on the conf call the other dayLOL

By the 21st Rambus must answer Samsung's brief on prevailing party and attorney's fees. Is this correct?YES

see next post

==========
12/02/2005 95 ORDER that, by December 14, 2005, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. shall file its response to Rambus, Inc.'s contention that the Rule 68 offer of judgment, served on Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. on November 29, 2005, divests the Court of subject matter jurisdiction. Rambus, Inc. shall file its reply by December 21, 2005. Signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 12/02/05. (kste, )(copies mailed and faxed) (Entered: 12/05/2005)