Thanks again Belize Oilwatch. It's important for all shareholders and new investors to know the fact as they are, not what some want the to be.
Posted by: Belize Oilwatch In reply to: tdbowieknife who wrote msg# 57060 Date:5/21/2013 10:01:57 AM Post #57062 of 57084
TD your posts are normally good but this one is off the mark.
I said what I said and you cannot put other words into my mouth.
Please stick to the facts.
------------------------------------------------------ The Judges judgment didn't apply to just offshore. It actually applied to 6 Offshore PSAs The judgment he gave said that the concessions were illegal, null and void was based on the fact that a proper EIA was not done (before awarding the concession) and that the concessions were awarded without using a competitive bidding process also awarded to company's that may not be qualified to do the work or have the resources to deal with a emergency.
And are you saying that Treaty just up and walk away and left the hole in a environmentally unsafe state? No. Read my post againThat sounds typical of Treaty. (In your opinion not mine) Again very unprofessional. (In my opinion it is more unprofessional of you to have this opinion of Treaty's Operations in Belize from a remote location. You must not have read the words in my previous post about Treaty doing things to Interntaional Petroleum Industry Standards now on SJ 3)