>>"Rich has his money safely stashed offshore" -- relevant, Rich is strongly associated with the company
After a few minutes of thought, this is just as irrlevant as Josef having money offshore.
It's just like saying the guy has his money in a Suntrust Bank account or a Citicorp account.
I think what is getting mixed in here with this is perception of what an 'offshore account' is. Just because someone has an offshore acct, doesn't make him dirty. If that was the case, then a significant amount of the people in the stock market would be criminals.
I think it is completely irrelvant where any officer has his money. And especially when it isn't backed by any kind of explanation or thoughts. The guy who posted that accomplished what he wanted. To disrupt the entire flow of discussion.
With that in mind, I'm curious to know how this is actually relevant to the dicussion. Nobody can refute or figure out if this guy is wrong or right. So how does it add to the "discussion"? That's what a discussion is about. A debate with some sort of intelligent thought backing it.
MB
p.s. I'm am playing the devil's advocate here for constructive purposes. Nothing more.