So it is the feeling by some that if one actually looks for facts behind a company and does not blindly follow one individual on a discussion board, that they are a professional?? On another board I was accused of being a Canadian agriculture specialist and competitor of that other company. For some not knowing about all the higher-ups leaving in mass must be disturbing. Not getting the financials promised must be discouraging. Losing 90 percent of your investment since the reverse split must be devastating. Being led to believe that a two year old award from a magazine made them the best and now realizing that is not true must be defeating. Telvue is not the only one in the dark, the fact that some want to vililfy those who disagree with no evidence to the contrary are very much in the dark. They've even taken off the rose colored glasses and are now blindly following the "buy if you can and never sell theory". There is no discussion to the facts presented here. As far as the professional designation, there is none, just a hard worker like you but one that is serious about finding the truth in a company. You can dismiss all my points, its your money. But even Joe stated that last years meeting was 5 minutes long and pointless. Mr Lenfest owns the majority and what he says goes, period. Maybe some will find out what is going on, but I doubt it. Like I said that will be a waste of time.
Bring some positive evidence contradicting my posts, contradicting the evidence I present to back my opinion. Bring something to this board that is positive without republishing PR's which we know mean nothing, then we can have a decent discussion. You see there is a post by Joe that specifically states its not about revenue but the shorts. And that is what you all are following? Hoping for a short conspiracy?? Good Luck, I wish you a profitable week ahead, and your facts presented to this board as to the financial health of TELVUE.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
