wow someone just pointed me to this post and all i can say is a thespian is born.....
" I happen to have a Law Degree, and a Masters of Law in International Taxation, and can state that had Mr. Kendrick not withdrawn and continued to merge with a company incapable of meeting Rule 144 I would have brought action against him for breaching his fiduciary duties to the shareholders of Mineseeker. I honestly hope that Mr. Kendrick does not waste a penny of the precious resources of Mineseeker on counsel to address such unfounded and baseless claims and accusations."
the non sequitor of one's "alleged pedigree" to a company incapable of meeting Rule 144 is code for PHONY
a company and nhs in and of itself is not incapable of meeting rule 144 and in fact it would be more accurate especially given the alleged pedigree of said long term investor that a company's investors-not the company-cannot avail themselves of the exemption allowed under rule 144 which is only the case if the company is deemed a shell, and, is still curable by reporting for a year...
friends and the company they keep, sorry sir you have been misinformed or misled and to think this post is stickied