News Focus
News Focus
Followers 11
Posts 3063
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/01/2002

Re: pgerassi post# 67214

Saturday, 12/03/2005 1:25:05 PM

Saturday, December 03, 2005 1:25:05 PM

Post# of 98357
TDP does not drive battery life,
Typical power does.
A 49C Opteron 170 uses less than 28W TDPmax. You could put that into a laptop and have good battery life.
The problem here is that you could not put that into a laptop with a 49C case temperature. The typical 28W laptop CPU will have a Tcase of 100C. Assuming an Ambient of 42C (the AMD number), the 49C Tcase part would need a heatsink almost 8 times larger than a 100C Tcase part.
In addition, it seems to be a common error to equate TDP to battery life. Typical power is a much better indicator of battery life than TDP. I think many believe TDP and typical power are related, and certainly they are... but that relationship is loose at best. For example, the Pentium-M has a TDP of around 25W and a typical of around 1W for a ratio of 25 to 1. OTOH, the P4 has a TDP of around 100W and a typical of what? 25W? Maybe 50W for a ratio of between 2 to 1 and 4 to 1.
Smaller TDP is important to keep the laptop thin and light.
Smaller typical power is important for long battery life.
--Alan
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News