Because of the seasonality of the Retail Industry, when comparing Growth in Revenue it should be compared with quarter to previous year quarter and year to previous year. We have the luxury of comparing Quarter over Quarter Growth with Bravada, but it would not be fair to compare a "out of season" revenue Quarter with an "In Season" revenue Quarter.
The growth from previous year quarter is how the Big board retail stocks do it as well. It is the reason why a Big Board Stock will still be showing a 10% growth Q1 even if their revenue is less then the previous Q4.
When comparing Bravada Q1 2013 I will be comparing it to the 2012 Q1 of $773,179.59 not the Q4 2012 of $1,239,246.06. Anything over the $773,179.59 2012 Q1 would be considered Bravada's "Growth."
All of that being said I do believe that we sill see a stronger Q1 2013 then that of Q4 2012. Which is sensational because just meeting the 2012 Q4 would represent a 60% growth from the same quarter the year prior. Anything over Q4 2012 for Q1 2013 would be sensational by a company growth fundamental standpoint.
Make no mistake about it, THAT IS HUGE GROWTH JUST TO MEET 2012 Q4 of $1,239,246. I believe Bravada comes in Higher. Setting the Bar to high (which I am guilty of myself sometimes) is doing Bravada as a company a gross injustice.
GLTA
GO BRAV
IMO=In My Opinion= My personal safety statement
Market Data 
Markets 
