News Focus
News Focus
Followers 23
Posts 1419
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/19/2008

Re: Lowjack post# 111083

Wednesday, 04/10/2013 2:59:50 AM

Wednesday, April 10, 2013 2:59:50 AM

Post# of 118206
Oops... final BME Litigation Update: settled 03/07/2013

Lowjack's post guilted me into checking for any updates, which I had not done since my last post (Feb. 9, 2013, #107553). The case settled and was dismissed on March 7, 2013. The terms of the settlement are not disclosed, at least not in court.

Anyone have any strong opinions on whether I should leave the materials online versus take them down?

As long as my firm has its website, there is no cost either way.
GL

Couple things:

1. The docket (including links to a subset of the filed documents) is available at http://client-email.com/dockets/PCFGvBME.html ; if anyone wants documents not linked, please feel free to let me know.

2. I am not your lawyer unless we have a written engagement letter, signed by both of us.

3. I have not had a chance to review the documents. Too busy, plus this really is not my area of law. I am sorry about that. One thing to keep in mind as you read them is that you (like the judge) must distinguish between advocacy and accuracy. In other words, reading just one side's papers may sound very convincing. By the same token, reading the other side's papers may sound equally convincing. But only one side is going to win on any given issue.

I still look forward to taking a look at these myself, and I have not checked each link. Let me know if there are any technical problems; let your lawyer know if you have any legal questions.



I am an amateur at this, and it would be unwise to rely on my opinions without your own independent confirmation in consultation with an investment professional.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today