i expect them to keep up the fight for the shareholders now that they got theirs. that's the problem. the suits did a remarkable job, not the company. if you think for one sec that the suits weren't involved long before the merger to get it to trial well. no i don't expect them to camp at the judges door, that's what legal is for. lol. they said we were RIPE for a judgement, right? if they believed that and believed from their point of view that it would be positive they could announce a share buyback. looks cheap enough, no? or why not change the name of the company and the cusip # to better reflect the companies future direction. those 2 simple acts could possibly force the shorts to begin to cover. unless for legal reasons they can't. maybe you could answer that?