News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257266
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122806
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: iwfal post# 158236

Wednesday, 03/13/2013 1:31:22 PM

Wednesday, March 13, 2013 1:31:22 PM

Post# of 257266

XOMA—If the IL-1 drugs were rejected in gout (where both had very strong efficacy) then I don't think it likely that using them in acne (or, by extension, another IL-1 drug) is likely to get approval. Hence my puzzlement over even trying in that indication.

Your argument overlooks dosing differences between the various IL-1 drugs and the various trials! As piggerpig noted in #msg-85635600, the Gevokicumab trial in acne used low doses, which were weight-based; the higher of the two doses tested was 0.6mg/kg, which equates to a fixed dose of 45mg on average for the patients in that trial arm. This is 1/3 less than the 60mg dose being tested in EYEGUARD-B (for Behçet’s uveitis).

If the acne program advances to phase-3, XOMA may seek to use a fixed dose rather than a weight-based dose; if so, the fixed dose will likely be less than 60mg.

p.s. XOMA has not yet committed to advancing the acne program to phase-3.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today