Science does not concern itself with the unprovable`
Tell that to Peter Duesburg Duesberg started questioning HIV in 1987. He claims there is no virological, nor epidemiological, evidence to back-up the HIV-AIDS hypothesis. Instead, the virus is biochemically inactive and harmless, and AIDS is not behaving as a contagious disease, he says.
What you describe as "science" is unfortunately something from an era gone by. The few real scientists ( for example Gilbert Ling, Peter Duesburg, Raymond Damadian who invented MRI.
How can Raymond Damadian be bypassed for an award on MRI? Dr. Damadian has already been credited with the discovery of MRI!)
of today would either describe current day vodoo science as a religion or would rant and rave about corruption. For the public to not be able to follow Duesburgs medical Ideas is one thing. For them to not figure out that the guy that invented MRI should not be passed up for a nobel prize for MRI when other people get them is another story alltogether. Science is corrupted in much the same way as religion in spite of the fact that most fools howl loudly to the contrary.