News Focus
News Focus
Followers 18
Posts 331
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/24/2012

Re: apprenante post# 26930

Monday, 03/04/2013 12:14:56 AM

Monday, March 04, 2013 12:14:56 AM

Post# of 380842
Nikodemos

Typically I appreciate your posts to highlight the positives. I agree with apprenante on this one. Yungblood is not impressive at this point. The contract announcement was a big "?" for me. It even made me worry that a pr was used on this company.

I often wonder if this board really makes any major influences in how the shares move, or protect the shares at its resistance. It probably does a minimal effect or else we would be at .50-$1 by now.

I imagine people with twitter, who have a tremendous amount of followers, would make more of an influence.

I use this board to continue my findings DD and seeing what many of us who think NTEK is a viable company that is worth .50 are thinking about specific PR and other potentials are.

Lets not overhype the stock. At this point we are over promising and the shares FEEL like its underperforming.

Lets get real here. It's a company that has no profit generating yet. We're still in the infant stages.

There is not a Samsung partnership or dialogue anywhere. It's a LONG stock and not a get rich quick. We doubled in value in merely a month...(well overnight to be exact) so we have some time to catch up and hold.

Be patient NTEKers. The time will come when non share holders will be kicking themselves at not getting in at .02.

In fact we need to demand more from the company as shareholders. REDUCE the # if Shares!! Get a partner or start creating a plan to reduce the # of shares by 50-60%.

Get a better website too while you're at it. For a nanotech company the website looks very archaic and sketchy.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y