News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257432
Next 10
Followers 69
Posts 6152
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/26/2008

Re: jq1234 post# 157737

Saturday, 03/02/2013 12:29:39 PM

Saturday, March 02, 2013 12:29:39 PM

Post# of 257432

Not only AAG doesn't relate to specific disease but also change too often, thus the nominal increase of response rate from 22% to 32% by using AAG baseline data point as "biomarker" retrospectively reflected something else in the trial population.

I wouldn't call a 45% increase in response rate nominal. Nonetheless, I still get the caveats about AAG selection.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today