InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252427
Next 10
Followers 69
Posts 6152
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/26/2008

Re: poorgradstudent post# 157735

Saturday, 03/02/2013 12:03:44 PM

Saturday, March 02, 2013 12:03:44 PM

Post# of 252427

What I'm saying is that this serum protein is probably just a reflection of patient health within the treatment cohort. So even though these people have failed X number of therapies, they're not in identical health nor is it a homogenous disease, and the baseline AAG measurement likely reflects that.

I'm pretty sure ARRY has said this is not the case at all and AAG levels do not correlate to patient health.

If I was ARRY I wouldn't exclude based on AAG. From the literature it doesn't appear that you can make a reliable, prospective stratification because many papers are just retroactively binning the serum levels into quartiles and quintiles. Dunno if you want to try and sort through all that and risk your clinical development plan on it.

Yeah, I'm not sure what ARRY is going to do for pivotals. They have discussed the various options but seem to be awaiting further data this year to inform pivotal trial decisions. Why not just run one pivotal where you don't stratify based on AAG and another where you do?

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.