News Focus
News Focus
Followers 21
Posts 1232
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/19/2002

Re: db_s99 post# 150

Tuesday, 11/15/2005 8:29:53 AM

Tuesday, November 15, 2005 8:29:53 AM

Post# of 457
To answer my own question:

On page 14 o the 10-Q regarding aquatic products "...there was a non-recurring recovery of bad debt which affected results materially." First time through I misread it. The recovery of bad debt in 3Q2004 increased the aquatic revenues for that quarter by $2.28M. So the comparison without the recovery would have been $5.9M revenue in 3Q2005 vs $4.22M in 3Q2004. If they collect the $197K in bad debt from 2005 then that would increase revenue even more this year.

The recovery was for past periods, not sure how many quarters it would have covered. So nice increase overall.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today